hash_empty(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

hash_empty β€” the lil vibe check that tells you whether your hashtable is literally empty or not ✨

okay so real talk, this is part of the Kernel API Manual and bestie, the page is called hash_empty(9) β€” that's the whole name, that's the whole job πŸŽ€


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

hash_empty (hashtable );

that's it. that's the whole call. no cap, it's giving minimalism πŸ‘‘


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • hashtable β€” the hashtable you wanna check 🫢 like, the actual one. the one you're wondering about. hand it over and let the macro do its thing.

🧚 DESCRIPTION 🧚

so here's the tea β˜• β€” this has to be a macro, and there's a genuinely iconic reason why: HASH_BITS will not work on pointers, because it calculates the size during preprocessing. πŸ’…

like, it's not a choice, it's a whole structural requirement, iykyk. the preprocessor is doing math before the compiler even wakes up, so pointers simply cannot come to the function-call party. not me explaining macros at 2am but here we are 😭


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

the whole hashtable friend group honestly, they all ate 🌈


lowkey a whole family of macros and you're over here checking if one of them is empty. valid. iconic. no notes. πŸ’œ

and that's the page!! πŸŽ€βœ¨ this lil writeup lives in ./tools/include/linux, dated October 2026, and it goes by hash_empty(9) in case anyone asks β€” mwah, stay hydrated, go check your hashtables πŸ’–πŸ¦‹πŸŒΈ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from