gmc_v10_0_us...te_semaphore(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸŽ€ gmc_v10_0_us...te_semaphore(9) πŸŽ€

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual page for gmc_v10_0_use_invalidate_semaphore(9) β€” yes, the header and footer shorten her to gmc_v10_0_us...te_semaphore(9) because terminal width is a hater πŸ’€. The actual function name is the full one, and the actual job is judge whether to use semaphore. It's giving tiny bool, huge main-character energy, no cap. πŸ’…

🌸 NAME 🌸

gmc_v10_0_use_invalidate_semaphore β€” judge whether to use semaphore. That's it, that's the whole assignment, and she ate. ✨

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

bool gmc_v10_0_use_invalidate_semaphore (struct amdgpu_device *adev ,
       uint32_t vmhub );

πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • adev β€” amdgpu_device pointer. Main-character pointer, literally exactly what the page says. No extra lore, bestie. 🫢
  • vmhub β€” vmhub type. Yep, that's the type, and that's the whole description. Iykyk. 🧚

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯


And that's the page, bestie πŸ«ΆπŸ’–. The footer's source/version bit is ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu in the Kernel API Manual, the date stamp is October 2026, and the footer title does the same cute gmc_v10_0_us...te_semaphore(9) thing. Mwah πŸ’‹βœ¨.

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from