gmap_is_shadow_valid(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ gmap_is_shadow_valid(9) ✨

okay so bestie, this is a page straight out of the Kernel API Manual, and it's literally the vibe check function for shadow guest address spaces. yes we're in that gmap_is_shadow_valid era πŸ’…


🌸 NAME 🌸

gmap_is_shadow_valid β€” checks if a shadow guest address space matches the given properties and is still valid. that's it, that's the whole job, no cap 🫢


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

bool gmap_is_shadow_valid (struct gmap *sg , union asce asce , int
edat_level );

like, look at her go 😭 she returns a bool and she takes three things, we love a tidy signature ✨


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • sg β€” pointer to the shadow guest address space structure. the main character of this whole function fr πŸ’–
  • asce β€” the ASCE for which the shadow table is requested. yes, that ASCE πŸ‘‘
  • edat_level β€” the Edat level to be used for the shadow translation. pick your level, bestie 🌈

πŸ’€ RETURN πŸ’€

returns true if the gmap shadow is still valid and matches the given properties, and the caller can keep on using it β€” slay, continue, you're good πŸ’…

returns false otherwise. and in that case the caller has to request a new shadow gmap. no reusing the stale one, that's giving expired vibes πŸ™ˆ


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

go read those too, iykyk πŸ“šβœ¨


πŸ’œ friendly reminder from your girl: the false branch is not a suggestion β€” go get yourself a brand new shadow gmap, periodt.

okay bestie that's the whole page, hope the vibe check passed!! this iconic lil doc lives in ./arch/s390/kvm/gmap, dated October 2026 β€” mwah, drink water, and don't forget to unshadow responsibly πŸ§šπŸ’–πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from