gc_sync_wbufs(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… gc_sync_wbufs β€” from the gc_sync_wbufs(9) kernel API manual, bestie

okay so picture this: it's a kernel API manual page, it's section 9, and it lives in ./fs/ubifs. and the star of the show is gc_sync_wbufs. buckle up πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

gc_sync_wbufs β€” sync write-buffers for GC. that's it, that's the whole vibe. literally just syncing write-buffers for GC πŸ¦‹


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int gc_sync_wbufs (struct ubifs_info *c );

🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • c β€” the UBIFS file-system description object. that's your girl, she's carrying all the info ✨

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

okay so here's the situation, and it's lowkey serious. we must guarantee that obsoleting nodes are on flash. that's non-negotiable. but unfortunately 😭 they may be hanging out in a write-buffer instead. rude of them honestly.

like, picture a node getting written to a write-buffer, and it's obsoleting another node that lives in a LEB that's getting GC'd. the way that's a whole problem is: if that LEB gets erased before the write-buffer is sync'd, and then there's an unclean unmount? then an existing node is just... lost. gone. not the vibe. πŸ’€

so to avoid alllll of that drama, we sync all write-buffers. every single one. no cap πŸ™ˆ

this function returns 0 on success, or a negative error code on failure. simple as that, periodt πŸ’…

bestie the stakes are real here β€” lost nodes after an unclean unmount are not it. sync first, always. πŸ”₯

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

kernel file ./fs/ubifs/gc.c, plus all these iconic friends:


✨ okay that's the whole page, mwah πŸ’‹ this cutie came from ./fs/ubifs and it's dated October 2026 β€” go off, calendar icon πŸ—“οΈπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from