fc_els_fill(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ¦‹ fc_els_fill(9) πŸ¦‹

okay bestie, you've opened the Kernel API Manual page for fc_els_fill(9), and it's giving short, mysterious, lowkey iconic. We're keeping every fact exactly where it belongs β€” the vibe is new, the details are not. ✨


πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

fc_els_fill β€” fill in an ELS request frame πŸ’…


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int fc_els_fill (struct fc_lport *lport , u32 did , struct fc_frame *fp
       , unsigned int op , enum fc_rctl *r_ctl , enum fc_fh_type *fh_type );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

Okay so the original ARGUMENTS section is literally six lines of -- undescribed --, and I am not gonna invent lore just to make it cute. Here's the whole cast, exactly as the page gives it:

  • lport β€” -- undescribed -- (mystery main character energy πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™€οΈ)
  • did β€” -- undescribed -- (the manpage said nothing, so neither will I πŸ™ˆ)
  • fp β€” -- undescribed -- (another little enigma πŸŽ€)
  • op β€” -- undescribed -- (no cap, that's the whole description πŸ’€)
  • r_ctl β€” -- undescribed -- (still a mystery, bestie πŸ¦‹)
  • fh_type β€” -- undescribed -- (and that's the last one, periodt πŸ’œ)
bestie, this is not me being lazy β€” every single argument on the original page is literally marked -- undescribed --. We respect the mystery. 🫢

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file: ./drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_encode.h β€” and the whole function squad is right here:


signing off from ./drivers/scsi/libfc with an October 2026 timestamp, still repping fc_els_fill(9) β€” bye bestie, mwah πŸ’œπŸ«Ά periodt.

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from