evict_should_delete(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… evict_should_delete(9) β€” the Kernel API Manual tea β˜•

Okay bestie, so this one lives in the Kernel API Manual and it's called evict_should_delete. Yes, it's exactly as dramatic as it sounds β€” we're doing a vibe check on an inode to see if it's ✨eligible for deletion✨.


🌸 NAME 🌸

evict_should_delete β€” determine whether the inode is eligible for deletion

Like, the whole point. That's the assignment. 🎯


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

enum evict_behavior evict_should_delete (struct inode *inode , struct gfs2_holder *gh );

Copy it exactly, okay? Don't come for me, this is verbatim fr fr. 🫢


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • inode β€” The inode to evict. This is the main character of the whole operation, ngl.
  • gh β€” The glock holder structure. The supporting cast, but lowkey essential. πŸ’…

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

So this function determines whether the evicted inode is eligible to be deleted, and β€” plot twist β€” it also locks the inode glock. Two jobs, one function, main character energy honestly. 😭


πŸ’– RETURN πŸ’–

It returns the fate of the dinode. Yep. The fate. Very dramatic. Destiny but make it a return value. πŸ”₯


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file ./fs/gfs2/super.c β€” and the whole friend group:

Read them all, bestie. For the lore. πŸ“šβœ¨


No cap, that's every single reference β€” didn't skip a one. Your faves are all here. 🫢

And that's the page, babe! Written by the ./fs/gfs2 girlies, dated October 2026 β€” yeah, they're from the future, and they still said evict_should_delete(9) at the bottom. Slay. πŸ’œπŸŽ€πŸ’«

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from