eventfd_signal_mask(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– eventfd_signal_mask(9) β€” the kernel API glow-up πŸ’–

okay so bestie, you're reading eventfd_signal_mask(9) β€” yes that's the manual name, we're being official today β€” and it's literally just about bumping a counter and yelling "overflow!!" at poll(2). let's get into it ✨


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void eventfd_signal_mask (struct eventfd_ctx *ctx , __poll_t mask );

that's the whole vibe. two args, no return, no drama πŸŽ€


🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • ctx β€” [in] a pointer to the eventfd context, aka the little handle on the thing you're counting. give it here πŸ’…
  • mask β€” [in] the poll mask. yes, it's just called "poll mask", that's the whole description, no notes πŸ™ˆ

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

okay so here's the tea πŸ“ β€” this function is supposed to be called by the kernel in code paths that do not allow sleeping. like, no napping allowed, we're in a no-sleep zone, keep it moving πŸƒβ€β™€οΈ

inside, we let the counter go all the way up to ULLONG_MAX. yes, the big one. max it out, why not πŸ‘‘

and when it hits that? we flag it as an overflow condition by returning EPOLLERR to poll(2). so poll(2) gets the messy news. that's the signal, that's the drama, that's the whole point πŸ’€

not me letting the counter hit ULLONG_MAX and then telling poll(2) about it. iconic behavior honestly 😭

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

go look at the kernel file ./fs/eventfd.c β€” it's all in there, iykyk πŸ“


⭐ sign-off ⭐

and that's the page, bestie πŸ¦‹ this one lives over in ./fs and it's dated October 2026 β€” so like, future icon behavior πŸ’œ go touch some kernel code, mwah πŸ’…βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from