es58x_hw_revision_is_valid(9)

✨ NAME ✨

Okay so this is es58x_hw_revision_is_valid(9), straight outta the Kernel API Manual, bestie — and it does exactly what it says on the tin:

• es58x_hw_revision_is_valid — check if the revision is a valid number. periodt 💅

---

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

bool es58x_hw_revision_is_valid (struct es58x_hw_revision *hw_rev );

---

🎀 ARGUMENTS 🎀

• hw_rev — the hardware’s revision number. that’s the whole vibe here 🫶

---

🦋 DESCRIPTION 🦋

So here’s the vibe check: if es58x_hw_revision.letter is not an alphanumeric character, the revision is invalid. also, if any of the hardware revision sub-numbers do not fit on three digits, it’s invalid too.

And like, most probably that means the product string could not be parsed 😭 — no cap, that’s the reason.

---

🔥 RETURN 🔥

• true if the hardware revision is valid 💖
• false otherwise 💀

---

👑 SEE ALSO 👑

• Kernel file ./drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_devlink.c
• es58x_parse_sw_version(9)
• es58x_parse_hw_rev(9)
• es58x_parse_product_info(9)
• es58x_sw_version_is_valid(9)
• es58x_devlink_info_get(9)

---

That’s the page, bestie 🫶 — source/version cuteness says ./drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x, dated October 2026, and we are so out: es58x_hw_revision_is_valid(9) ✨