ecryptfs_d_revalidate(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ecryptfs_d_revalidate(9) πŸ’…

okay so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual, bestie β€” like the actual kernel docs, not the vibes-only version. buckle up πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

ecryptfs_d_revalidate β€” revalidate an ecryptfs dentry, that's the whole gig πŸ¦‹


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int ecryptfs_d_revalidate (struct inode *dir , const struct qstr *name ,
       struct dentry *dentry , unsigned int flags );

like yes she takes four args and returns an int, we been knew πŸ’…


✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • dir β€” the inode of the expected parent. the parent, the one you expect, okay πŸ‘‘
  • name β€” the expected name. yep, the name you're expecting, not a surprise πŸŽ€
  • dentry β€” the dentry to revalidate. she's the main character of this function fr fr πŸ¦‹
  • flags β€” lookup flags. the flags for the lookup. that's it, that's the whole thing 🌸

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

so this bad boy gets called when the VFS needs to revalidate a dentry. and it's not a one-time thing either β€” it's literally called whenever a name lookup finds a dentry in the dcache. every time, bestie 😭

and here's the thing: most filesystems leave this as NULL, because all their dentries in the dcache are valid already. so they just don't bother. iconic of them honestly. but not ecryptfs β€” ecryptfs said "not me, I'm built different" and wrote a whole function πŸ’€

returns 1 if it's valid, 0 otherwise. that's the contract. no in-between, no "well actually", just 1 or 0. vibe check: pass or fail ⭐

✨ SEE ALSO ✨

  • the kernel file ./fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c β€” go read the source, iykwim πŸ‘€
  • ecryptfs_d_release(9) β€” her sibling, the release counterpart, go show her some love too 🫢

alright bestie that's the whole page, no notes ✨

shoutout to ./fs/ecryptfs for hosting this and to October 2026 for the date stamp β€” the source and version said hi, and honestly? slay πŸŽ€πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from