e1000_check_for_rst_vf(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… e1000_check_for_rst_vf β€” checks to see if the PF has reset

okay so bestie, welcome to e1000_check_for_rst_vf, a little function living in the Kernel API Manual, and honestly? it does exactly one job and it does it slayfully. let's get into it πŸŽ€


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

s32 e1000_check_for_rst_vf (struct e1000_hw *hw );

like yes, that's the whole signature, no cap. it takes one thing and returns one thing, main character energy fr fr πŸ’…


🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • hw β€” pointer to the HW structure. that's it, that's the whole argument. it's giving "one job, one pointer" 🫢

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

so what does it actually do? it returns true if the PF has set the reset done bit, or else it returns false. that's the vibe check. done bit set = true bestie ✨, done bit not set = false 😭. no in-between, no lore, no side quests. iconic behavior honestly πŸ‘‘


πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

like the whole friend group showed up to the function's party, we love to see it 🌈


ngl the source path got chopped in the original footer to ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i... β€” that's a real abbreviation, not me being lazy, okay? πŸ™ˆ

and that's the page!! sourced from ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i..., dated October 2026, in the e1000_check_for_rst_vf(9) era. mwah πŸ’‹βœ¨ go check that reset bit, bestie πŸ“

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from