drm_dp_dpcd_write_data(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ drm_dp_dpcd_write_data ✨

okay bestie so this is from the Kernel API Manual and it's giving "tiny function, big responsibilities" energy πŸ’… she writes a whole series of bytes to the DPCD and she does NOT do it casually.


🌸 NAME 🌸

drm_dp_dpcd_write_data β€” write a series of bytes to the DPCD πŸ¦‹

like literally, a series of bytes, not just one, that's the whole point of her


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

int drm_dp_dpcd_write_data (struct drm_dp_aux *aux , unsigned int offset
, void *buffer , size_t size );

πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • aux β€” the DisplayPort AUX channel, and yes it can be SST or MST, both are welcome here 🫢
  • offset β€” the address of the (first) register you're writing to, aka where the party starts
  • buffer β€” the buffer holding the values you want to write, this is your payload bestie
  • size β€” how many bytes are in buffer, don't lie to her about this 🌈

πŸ‘‘ DESCRIPTION πŸ‘‘

so here's the vibe check: she returns zero (0) on success πŸŽ‰, or a negative error code on failure, no cap.

  • -EIO gets returned if the request was NAKed by the sink 😭 or if the retry count was exceeded (she tried, she really did)
  • if not all bytes were transferred, this function returns -EPROTO β€” partial sends are not it fr fr
  • errors coming from the underlying AUX channel transfer function get propagated to the caller, with one exception: -EBUSY, which just causes the transaction to be retried πŸ” (she's persistent like that)
ngl, keep an eye on those return codes β€” -EIO means the sink said no, -EPROTO means the bytes didn't all make it. both are real and both matter πŸ’€

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

okay this list is LONG but we're doing all of it, no skipping, periodt πŸ’…


and that's the whole page bestie, go write some bytes responsibly πŸ’œ

mwah πŸ’‹ this came from ./include/drm/display, dated October 2026 β€” that's the source and the date, and honestly? iconic of them to ship it like that ⭐

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from