drbd_resume_next(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… drbd_resume_next(9) β€” the Kernel API Manual, but make it make sense πŸŽ€

okay so bestie, we're in the kernel API manual and this one is drbd_resume_next(9) β€” yes it's a section 9 page, yes it's kernel internals, no you don't have to be scared. it's giving "niche but iconic" and honestly? we're gonna slay this. ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

drbd_resume_next β€” resume resync on all devices that may resync now πŸ¦‹

like, all of them. the ones that are allowed to go. the vibe check is "are you ready to resync? yes? go."


⭐ SYNOPSIS ⭐

bool drbd_resume_next (struct drbd_device *device );

that's it. that's the whole signature. a bool comes out the other side, and a struct drbd_device * goes in. no cap. πŸ’–


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • device β€” DRBD device. that's the one. the device in question. the main character of this function call, literally. πŸ‘‘

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

so what does it actually do? it resumes resync on all devices that may resync now β€” which is exactly what the NAME said, because this page is nothing if not consistent. πŸ’…

and here's the important little detail you're not gonna skip: it's called from process context only. read that again. process context only. the two places it comes from are the admin command and the worker. so if you were thinking about calling this from somewhere spicy, bestie, no. πŸ™ˆ that is not the move.

process context only, fr fr. admin command and worker. don't get cute with it. πŸ’€

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈


and that's the page!! πŸ“ go be normal about kernel resync, or don't, honestly, live your truth.

sign-off time: this little gem lives under ./drivers/block/drbd, it's dated October 2026, and it answers to the name drbd_resume_next(9) β€” so when you cite it, cite it with your whole chest. periodt. πŸ’œβœ¨πŸ‘‘

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from