do_validate_mem(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… do_validate_mem(9) πŸ’…

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” yes we're in kernel land today, and honestly? it's giving low-level icon energy. this page is all about do_validate_mem, which lowkey validates a memory region for PCMCIA use. no cap, that's the whole vibe.


✨ NAME ✨

do_validate_mem β€” low level validate a memory region for PCMCIA use 🫢


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int do_validate_mem (struct pcmcia_socket *s , unsigned long base ,
       unsigned long size , int (*validate)(struct pcmcia_socket *s, struct
       resource *res, unsigned int *value) );

like, that's the whole signature, and yes, that callback param is a whole mood (it's long, we respect it) πŸ’€


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • s β€” the PCMCIA socket you're validating, bestie. that's the main character.
  • base β€” the start address of the resource to check. where it all begins ✨
  • size β€” the size of the resource to check. how much of it we're looking at.
  • validate β€” the validation function to use. the little helper that actually does the vibe check πŸ‘‘

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

okay so here's the tea: do_validate_mem splits up the memory region that's being checked into two parts. both parts get passed to the validate function. πŸ¦‹

and then the check fails if any of these three things happen:

  1. validate returns non-zero 😭
  2. the value parameter passed to validate is zero
  3. the value parameter is different between the two calls (like, inconsistent much? πŸ™ˆ)

if it fails, it returns -EINVAL. else β€” and this is the slay part β€” it returns 0. periodt. πŸ’…


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯


🌈 a lil sign-off 🌈

this lil page lives under ./drivers/pcmcia, dated October 2026 β€” so like, future vibes but make it kernel. stay validating, bestie, and remember: two parts, one validate, zero drama unless value disagrees with itself πŸ§šπŸ’œ

mwah πŸ’‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from