dma_buf_fd_install(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dma_buf_fd_install(9) β€” the Kernel API Manual glow-up

okay bestie, so like… this is from the Kernel API Manual, and honestly? she's a short one but she's important. no cap.


✨ NAME ✨

dma_buf_fd_install β€” installs a reserved fd for a dma-buf πŸŽ€

like… it literally takes your little pre-booked fd and makes it real. main character energy tbh.


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dma_buf_fd_install (struct dma_buf *dmabuf , int fd );

that's it. that's the whole vibe. no return value, she just does the thing. πŸ¦‹


πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • dmabuf β€” [in] pointer to dma_buf. the actual buffer object in question, your little guy.
  • fd β€” [in] fd reserved with get_unused_fd_flags. note the "reserved" β€” you already called dibs on this number and now you're cashing it in.

πŸ‘‘ DESCRIPTION πŸ‘‘

Publishes a previously reserved fd into the caller's fd table. lowkey iconic behaviour β€” the fd was in limbo and now she's officially published, like dropping a group chat screenshot to the story. ✨

⚠️ big important warning, seriously bestie: Must only be called after all fallible work (e.g. copy_to_user) has succeeded, as it cannot be undone safely once called. 😭 like, there's no undo button, no ctrl+z, no "wait nvm". once she's in the fd table, she's IN. so do all your risky stuff FIRST, then call this. periodt. πŸ’€

The caller is responsible for having emitted the trace event (via dma_buf_fd or get_unused_fd_flags + this function) before calling this. so β€” trace event first, then this. the order is not a suggestion, it's the whole point. 🫢


πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

buckle up, this list is long, but she ate and left no crumbs πŸ‘‘



🌈 and that's the page!! sourced straight out of ./drivers/dma-buf, dated October 2026, filed under dma_buf_fd_install(9) β€” go forth and install those fds responsibly, bestie πŸ’œπŸ“πŸ§š

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from