dm_test_set_..._no_dmub_psr(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’œ dm_test_set_..._no_dmub_psr(9) πŸ’œ

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual entry for dm_test_set_..._no_dmub_psr(9) β€” yes that's the whole name, it's giving "my function name is a paragraph" energy and honestly? iconic. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

dm_test_set_psr_caps_no_dmub_psr β€” DMUB PSR capability is required. that's it, that's the whole vibe check. πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dm_test_set_psr_caps_no_dmub_psr (struct kunit *test );

like, it returns nothing (void, main character who gives nothing back 😌) and it takes exactly one thing. no cap.


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • test β€” the KUnit test context. literally the group chat it's posting into, that's the whole job. 🫢

⭐ SEE ALSO ⭐

okay this is the part where the manpage goes full "let me introduce you to my entire friend group" and ngl it ATE. every single one of these, no skipping, periodt:

and the source file they all live in, bestie, come get your lore:

Kernel file ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_psr_test.c

lowkey reminder: this is a test helper living under the AMD display test tree, so like… it's test-scoped, iykyk. πŸ”₯

that's the whole page, bestie, you're caught up πŸ’– this cutie was served up from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and it's dated October 2026 β€” go forth and test your PSR caps, mwah πŸ§šβ€β™€οΈβœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from