dm_test_lin..._granularity(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_lin..._granularity(9) β€” like, the whole NAME thing first

okay bestie so this page lives in the Kernel API Manual, and the function's full government name is dm_test_link_supports_psrsu_missing_granularity β€” yes the header abbreviates it to dm_test_lin..._granularity(9) because apparently even kernel docs get tired mid-word 😭

🌸 NAME 🌸

dm_test_link_supports_psrsu_missing_granularity β€” the required granularity has got to be reported by the panel. Like, it's not optional, it's giving mandatory. no cap πŸ’…


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void dm_test_link_supports_psrsu_missing_granularity (struct kunit *test
);

that's it, that's the whole vibe β€” one void function, one arg, zero drama πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • test β€” the KUnit test context. the lil backstage pass for the test, basically. main character energy for your test harness πŸ‘‘

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

so here's the thing, bestie β€” this function does not roll alone. it's part of a whole friend group, and honestly? the group chat is huge. let's meet everyone 🫢

first up, the kernel file where all this lives:

./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_psr_test.c

then the psrsu link-support besties:

the set_psr_caps squad, all lining up:

the psr_set_event girlies:

and the psr_is_active_allowed crew closing out the list:

like I said. huge friend group. every single one is invited to the function party πŸŽ‰


lowkey a reminder that this is a kernel API page, so it's all (9) section energy β€” not your regular userland command, okay? iykyk 🌈

and that's the whole page, bestie! this icon was brought to you by the Kernel API Manual, sourced from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/..., dated October 2026. go forth and report your granularity πŸ’–βœ¨πŸ“

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from