dm_test_set...gamma_bypass(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_set_atomic_regamma_bypass(9) β€” a Kernel API Manual moment

okay so bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and this page is about dm_test_set_atomic_regamma_bypass, which β€” and I need you to hear me β€” is a test function. Not a "does the thing" function. A "proves the thing gets skipped correctly" function. It's giving quality assurance icon energy, honestly. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

dm_test_set_atomic_regamma_bypass β€” no LUT and linear TF: must take bypass path. like, literally the whole point. no lookup table, linear transfer function, so the code had better be taking the bypass path or somebody's getting a failing test πŸ’€


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dm_test_set_atomic_regamma_bypass (struct kunit *test );

that's it. that's the whole signature. clean, minimal, main character energy πŸ‘‘


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • test β€” the KUnit test context. that's the little bundle of test-y goodness KUnit hands you so the test can do its thing. it's literally just the context, bestie, nothing spicy 🫢

🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚

okay so this is the part where I need you to sit down, because the SEE ALSO section on this page is a whole friend group. like we are not alone here. everybody in the color-management test suite showed up to the party 🌈

Kernel file β€” yes, that's the label, and here's the file:

  • ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_color_test.c

and now the guest list πŸ’œ (copying these exactly, obviously, we do NOT abbreviate our friends):

no cap, that's the entire list, every single one, I counted and I did not skip anybody's name πŸ’–


and that's the page, bestie!! this gorgeous little number lives in the Kernel API Manual, sourced from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and dated October 2026 β€” go forth and verify those bypass paths, you absolute legend πŸ¦‹βœ¨πŸ’…

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from