dm_test_perf...estamp_basic(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_perf_trace_timestamp_basic β€” the Kernel API Manual, bestie edition ✨

okay so real talk, we're deep in the Kernel API Manual today and the star of the show is dm_test_perf_trace_timestamp_basic(9). she's a KUnit test, she's lowkey iconic, and she has one (1) job: prove that a thing doesn't explode. let's get into it 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

dm_test_perf_trace_timestamp_basic β€” Test Perf trace timestamp basic. that's literally the whole vibe. no cap. πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

void dm_test_perf_trace_timestamp_basic (struct kunit *test );

that's it. that's the signature. void, no return, in and out, periodt. πŸ’…


🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • test β€” the KUnit test context 🧚 that's her little backstage pass, she needs it to know which test she's currently slaying.

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

okay so here's the tea β˜• β€” a tracepoint with no attached probe is a total no-op. it literally does nothing, it's giving "ghosted by the probe." πŸ‘»

so this test is here to check that the function dereferences ctx->perf_trace safely and does not crash. that's the whole assignment. no crash = ate. πŸ”₯ if it crashes, well… 😭 we don't talk about that.


πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

Kernel file β€” go read the source, iykyk:

./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_services_test.c

and now, the whole friend group of sibling tests, gathered for the group chat 🌈:

like, the way that list just keeps going?? main character energy from every single one of them honestly πŸ’œ


okay that's the whole page bestie, no filler, every single detail intact πŸ“ go forth and crash nothing ✨

kisses, and remember β€” this page came to you from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... with October 2026 as the date, and it's all about dm_test_perf...estamp_basic(9) forever and always πŸ’…πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from