dm_test_ism_...d_transition(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_ism_trigger_event_valid_transition(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual

okay so bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and this page is literally about dm_test_ism_trigger_event_valid_transition πŸŽ€ yes the header truncates it to dm_test_ism_...d_transition(9) β€” that's just the title being dramatic and shy, the real name is the long one up there ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

dm_test_ism_trigger_event_valid_transition β€” the test that proves a valid event advances the current and previous state. that's it, that's the whole vibe πŸ¦‹


⭐ SYNOPSIS ⭐

void dm_test_ism_trigger_event_valid_transition (struct kunit *test );

one function, returns void, takes a single struct kunit * β€” clean, minimal, iconic πŸ‘‘


🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • test β€” the KUnit test context. that's the little bundle of test-ness that gets handed in so the test can do its thing πŸ’–

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

the kernel file lives right here, no cap:

./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_ism_test.c

and here's the whole friend group, all the sibling tests you can go hang out with β€” every single one, not skipping a single bestie πŸ’œ:


ngl, if you're looking for the invalid transition test, that's dm_test_ism_trigger_event_invalid_transition(9) β€” this page is strictly the valid-glow-up arc πŸ’…

and that's the whole page, bestie, you ate it up 🌈


🌸 okay so that's a wrap πŸŽ€ this one's sourced from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/..., dated October 2026, and it signs off as dm_test_ism_...d_transition(9) β€” same truncated little nickname as the top, we love consistency βœ¨πŸ’–πŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from