dm_test_fill...butes_block0(9)

📦 version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

💅 dm_test_fill...butes_block0(9) 💅

okay so this is straight out of the Kernel API Manual, bestie — yes, that Kernel API Manual. come sit, we're talking GFX12 block stuff and it's honestly a serve 🎀

✨ NAME ✨

dm_test_fill_gfx12_plane_attributes_block0 — the one where we verify the GFX12 64B max-compressed-block path. that's the whole vibe check, we're checking the path, bestie 🦋

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dm_test_fill_gfx12_plane_attributes_block0 (struct kunit *test );

🧚 ARGUMENTS 🧚

  • test — the KUnit test context. that's it, that's the whole argument. she's low maintenance, periodt 💅

🔥 DESCRIPTION 🔥

so here's the tea ☕ — this one asks: if the max-compressed-block modifier is zero, does it actually select the 64B independent block mode on GFX12? that's the question, and this test is not leaving until it gets an answer. verify and slay, no cap 💖

👑 SEE ALSO 👑

the whole group chat, fr fr — every single one of these is in the kernel file ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_plane_test.c, and here's the entire cast, no one left out, i could NEVER:

okay that's the whole page, you ate that 🍓 and before you go — this little beauty came from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and she's dated October 2026, so jot that down for the group chat. mwah, go read the source, iykyk 💜🫶

📦 where this page comes from