dm_test_ato...g_crtc_state(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_ato...g_crtc_state(9) πŸ’…

okay so this one is straight out of the Kernel API Manual β€” yes, the truncated title is literally what the page calls itself, iykyk 😭 the full name is right below tho, don't panic.


✨ NAME ✨

dm_test_atomic_check_missing_crtc_state β€” the vibe check that confirms a missing CRTC state actually fails πŸ’€


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dm_test_atomic_check_missing_crtc_state (struct kunit *test );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • test β€” the KUnit test context. that's the whole thing, bestie, it's giving minimal ✨

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

so what this test does: it verifies that atomic_check rejects a plane with DC state when the atomic CRTC state is absent. like, no CRTC state? not today. it should fail, and this test makes sure it does 🫢

fr fr β€” the absence of the CRTC state is the whole point. the rejection is the expected, correct behaviour here, not a bug πŸ™ˆ

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

and now the main character energy: the entire friend group πŸ’– the kernel file lives at ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_plane_test.c and here's every single sibling, no cap:


that's the whole guest list, ate and left no crumbs πŸ’…βœ¨

and the cute lil sign-off: this page comes from the file path ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... (yes it's cut off, the manpage said so, not me 😭), dated October 2026, and it's page dm_test_ato...g_crtc_state(9) in the Kernel API Manual. mwah πŸ«ΆπŸŽ€πŸŒΈ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from