devm_tegra_m...add_provider(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… devm_tegra_mipi_add_provider(9)

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual ✨ β€” today's main character is devm_tegra_mipi_add_provider, and honestly? she's giving "managed registration of a Tegra MIPI calibration function provider." no cap, that's literally the whole NAME section, and we're obsessed. πŸŽ€


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int devm_tegra_mipi_add_provider (struct device *device , struct
       device_node *np , const struct tegra_mipi_ops *ops );

like yes, that's the signature, copy it exactly pls πŸ™ˆ


🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • device β€” handle to the device that's providing the MIPI calibration function. she's the one doing the providing, periodt.
  • np β€” the device node pointer of that same device providing the MIPI calibration function. yes, both device and np point at the provider, that's not a typo, that's just how it is πŸ’–
  • ops β€” the operations supported by the MIPI calibration device. the whole skill tree, basically πŸ”₯

🌸 DESCRIPTION 🌸

so what she does is: this registers a device that provides MIPI calibration functions. iconic behaviour. πŸ‘‘

and like, the lore matters here β€” for Tegra20 and Tegra30, the thing doing the providing is the CSI block. but Tegra114 and newer SoC generations? they got a whole dedicated hardware block just for these functions. glow up fr fr πŸ¦‹

Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on failure. that's it, that's the tea β€” zero means slay, negative means 😭.


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

your reading list, bestie, no skipping:


k bye ily, this page lives in ./drivers/gpu/host1x, it's dated October 2026, and it's the devm_tegra_m...add_provider(9) page from the Kernel API Manual β€” mwah πŸ’‹ πŸ§šβ€β™€οΈ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from