devm_dma_request_chan(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… devm_dma_request_chan(9) β€” the managed-channel glow-up

okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual page for devm_dma_request_chan(9) ✨ ngl this one is short but it's so useful β€” it's the "try to allocate an exclusive slave channel" girlie, and she comes with built-in cleanup energy πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

devm_dma_request_chan β€” try to allocate an exclusive slave channel πŸ¦‹


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

struct dma_chan * devm_dma_request_chan (struct device *dev , const char
*name );

🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • dev β€” pointer to client device structure πŸ’– (the device that's doing the asking, iykyk)
  • name β€” slave channel name ⭐ (yes queen, tell it which channel you want)

πŸ‘‘ DESCRIPTION πŸ‘‘

So like, this function returns a pointer to the appropriate DMA channel on success, or an error pointer 😭 β€” that's the whole vibe check. Either you get your channel or you get a sad little error pointer, no in-between πŸ’€

The operation is managed, and it will be undone on driver detach 🧚 periodt. That's the devm_ part doing its main character work β€” no manual cleanup era, the kernel handles it for you when the driver dips πŸ™ˆ

lowkey the best part: you don't have to remember to release it. The managed lifecycle ate and left no crumbs πŸ’…

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

Kernel file ./drivers/dma/dmaengine.c πŸ“ and all her friends:


and that's the whole page, bestie πŸ’œ written from ./drivers/dma, dated October 2026, under the manual name devm_dma_request_chan(9) β€” slay, go request your channel, you've got this πŸŒˆπŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from