devlink_port...ter_with_ops(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual page for devlink_port_register_with_ops(9) β€” yes the title is literally truncated with dots in the header, that's just how it's printed, we don't fix it, we respect it ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

devlink_port_register_with_ops β€” Register devlink port. that's it. that's the vibe. registering a port, but make it devlink πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

int devlink_port_register_with_ops (struct devlink *devlink , struct
devlink_port *devlink_port , unsigned int port_index , const struct
devlink_port_ops *ops );

literally the whole signature, copied exactly, no cap. it returns an int, and yes we looked at it very respectfully πŸ‘‘


πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • devlink β€” the devlink. iconic. no notes. it's the struct devlink * you're passing in 🫢
  • devlink_port β€” the devlink port, i.e. the struct devlink_port * getting registered, main character energy fr fr
  • port_index β€” the driver-specific numerical identifier of the port. driver-specific!! numerical!! it's an unsigned int and it's yours to define 🌈
  • ops β€” port ops. the const struct devlink_port_ops *. the operations. the whole point. obsessed πŸ’…

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

so what this does: it registers the devlink port with the port index you provide. and here's the cute part β€” you can use any indexing you want, even a hw-related one. go off, honestly πŸ”₯

also, the devlink_port structure is convenient to be embedded inside your driver's private structure. like, structurally it just fits, it's giving designed-for-it 🧚

⚠️ but listen β€” the caller should take care of zeroing the devlink_port structure. that's on you, bestie. not the kernel. you. zero it. πŸ™ˆ

⭐ CONTEXT ⭐

takes and releases devlink->lock <mutex>. so like, the lock is handled, but that's a mutex situation, be aware, don't be weird about it 😭


🌟 SEE ALSO 🌟

kernel file ./net/devlink/port.c and the whole friend group:


and that's the page!! sourced from ./net/devlink, dated October 2026, and it signs off as devlink_port...ter_with_ops(9) because the header and the footer are the same beastie. slay, go register your port, zero your struct πŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from