dbg_check_old_index(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dbg_check_old_index(9) β€” like, the old index vibe check

okay bestie, so this one lives in the Kernel API Manual and it's called dbg_check_old_index β€” yes it's a mouthful, yes it ate, we move. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

dbg_check_old_index β€” check the old copy of the index. that's it, that's the whole job, and honestly? iconic. πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int dbg_check_old_index (struct ubifs_info *c , struct ubifs_zbranch *zroot );

like literally that's the whole signature, no cap 🫢


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • c β€” the UBIFS file-system description object. your whole fs situation lives in here, she's the main character πŸ‘‘
  • zroot β€” root of the new index. the fresh one. the new-new. 🌈

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

okay so here's the lore, bestie. in order to be able to recover from an unclean unmount, a complete copy of the index must exist on flash. this one is what we call the "old" index. 🧚

the commit process has to write the "new" index to flash without overwriting or destroying any part of the old index. like, delicate work. main character energy but make it careful. πŸŽ€

this function gets run at commit end specifically to check that the old index does indeed exist, completely intact. it's giving vibe check at the door. πŸ’…

and the returns:

  • 0 on success β€” slay ✨
  • a negative error code on failure β€” πŸ’€
fr fr, if it's negative something's off with your old index and you should be paying attention, not scrolling.

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

go read these too, iykyk:


and that's the page, bestie 🫢 this lil gem comes from ./fs/ubifs, dated October 2026, and the header said Kernel API Manual β€” we love a documented kernel function. mwah πŸ’‹πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from