cros_ec_lpc_mec_in_range(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– cros_ec_lpc_mec_in_range(9) β€” like, the Kernel API Manual era πŸ’–

okay so bestie, gather round, because we're diving into cros_ec_lpc_mec_in_range from the Kernel API Manual and honestly? she's a little legend. this one is literally the vibe check for addresses β€” it tells you whether they're hanging out in the MEC EMI range or not. no cap. πŸ¦‹


✨ NAME ✨

cros_ec_lpc_mec_in_range β€” bestie's whole job is determining if addresses are in the MEC EMI range. that's it, that's the gig. πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int cros_ec_lpc_mec_in_range (unsigned int offset , unsigned int length );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • offset β€” the address offset, like where we're starting our little investigation πŸ”
  • length β€” the number of bytes to check. yes, we're checking a whole stretch, not just one lil byte 🫢

πŸ‘‘ RETURN πŸ‘‘

here's the tea, and it's giving very clear-cut:

  • returns 1 if it's in range πŸ’š
  • returns 0 if it's not in range πŸ™ˆ
  • returns -EINVAL on failure β€” for example, when the mec range hasn't been initialized yet 😭 (that's your classic "girl, we're not even set up" situation)

🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚


πŸ’€ friendly reminder that the -EINVAL case is real and it will happen if the mec range isn't initialized β€” so like, init first, ask questions later. periodt. πŸ”₯

and that's the whole page, bestie, no gatekeeping πŸ’œ β€” this lil masterpiece lives in ./drivers/platform/chrome and is dated October 2026, so mark your calendars and stan responsibly. slay! πŸŒˆβ­πŸ“

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from