cpufreq_rem...te_util_hook(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… cpufreq_remove_update_util_hook(9) πŸ’…

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” this is the page for cpufreq_remove_update_util_hook, and yes the header up top abbreviates it as cpufreq_rem...te_util_hook(9) because apparently even kernel docs need a little drama with their ellipses. anyway. sit down, hydrate, let's go 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

cpufreq_remove_update_util_hook β€” literally just clears the CPU's update_util_data pointer. that's it. that's the whole job. iconic minimalism πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void cpufreq_remove_update_util_hook (int cpu );

it returns void, so like… don't go looking for a return value, babe. there isn't one. it's giving "no thoughts, head empty, but make it C." 😌


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • cpu β€” the CPU you want to clear the pointer for. that's the one. the chosen one. the CPU in question πŸ‘‘

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

so what it does: it clears the update_util_data pointer for the given CPU. clear as a freshly wiped mirror, fr fr ✨

BUT β€” and this is the part where you pay attention, bestie, because this is not a drill 🚨 β€” callers must use RCU callbacks to free any memory that might be accessed via the old update_util_data pointer, or invoke synchronize_rcu right after this function. why? to avoid use-after-free. and use-after-free is that girl who ruins the whole party πŸ’€ so like… do the RCU thing. please. for me. πŸ™

ngl this is the kind of caveat that looks like a vibe and is actually load-bearing. do not skip it. the memory-safety girlies will come for you 😭

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

iykyk πŸ’œ


and that's the page!! mwah πŸ’‹ this one lives under ./kernel/sched and the docs are stamped October 2026, so like… future-dated slay, we love to see it ⭐ πŸŽ€ bye bestie, go clear those pointers responsibly πŸ§šβ€β™€οΈπŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from