cpu_pm_unregister_notifier(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… cpu_pm_unregister_notifier β€” the Kernel API Manual page you actually wanna read πŸŽ€

okay so bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and the star of the show is cpu_pm_unregister_notifier(9) β€” yes the whole entire name, she's long, she's iconic, deal with it ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

cpu_pm_unregister_notifier β€” unregister a driver with cpu_pm 🫢


⭐ SYNOPSIS ⭐

int cpu_pm_unregister_notifier (struct notifier_block *nb );

that's it. that's the whole vibe check. one function, one argument, she ate πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • nb β€” the notifier block to be unregistered, literally just hand her the block and she'll take it from there πŸŽ€

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

okay so here's the tea β˜• β€” this function removes a driver from the CPU PM notifier list. like, she's the one who hits "leave group" on the notifier chain for you, no drama, no cap πŸ’€

and the returns?? highkey important β€” this function has the same return conditions as raw_notifier_chain_unregister. so like, don't go inventing your own expectations, check that one for the full story, iykyk πŸ‘‘

ngl bestie, "same return conditions as raw_notifier_chain_unregister" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here β€” that's the actual contract, so go look it up before you assume anything πŸ™ˆ

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

like the whole cpu_pm friend group, fr fr πŸ’–


and that's the page!! mwah 😘 this one came to you from ./kernel, dated October 2026, and yes the header/footer both said cpu_pm_unregister_notifier(9) again because the manpage said it thrice and we respect the repetition πŸ’œ stay slaying, go unregister responsibly πŸ§šβ€β™€οΈπŸŒΈ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from