cpc_ffh_supported(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… cpc_ffh_supported(9) β€” Kernel API Manual energy

okay so bestie, welcome to the cpc_ffh_supported(9) page ✨ this one lives in the Kernel API Manual and it's genuinely so simple it's giving "one-line baddie" β€” but like, important one-line baddie, yk? πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

cpc_ffh_supported β€” literally just checking if FFH reading is supported, that's it, that's the whole vibe check πŸ’–


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

bool cpc_ffh_supported (void );

✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • void β€” no arguments, nada, zero, empty set 🫢 she takes nothing and she gives you a bool, main character energy fr

πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

So what she actually does: she checks whether the architecture has support for functional fixed hardware read/write capability πŸ‘‘ that's the whole thing. No side quests, no hidden params, no surprises. She goes and asks the architecture "hey do you support FFH read/write", and comes back with an answer 😌

it's giving very much "are we doing this or not" energy and honestly? iconic πŸ’…


πŸ”₯ RETURN πŸ”₯

  • true β€” supported πŸŽ‰ slay, go read your FFH
  • false β€” not supported 😭 no FFH for you, bestie

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

So there's a whole girlie-pop group of related calls and they all hang out in the kernel file ./drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c β€” go say hi to the whole squad πŸ§šπŸ’«


quick reminder bestie: this page is filed under ./drivers/acpi and it's dated October 2026 🌸 so if you're reading this from the future, hi, love you, hope FFH is supported πŸ’–

and that's the page!! short, sweet, and to the point β€” no cap, sometimes the smallest manpage is the most chill one πŸŽ€βœ¨πŸ’…πŸ¦‹πŸ«Ά

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from