continue_at_nobarrier(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’« continue_at_nobarrier(9) β€” the kernel API manual, bestie edition πŸ’«

okay so we're in the <hotpink>kernel API manual</hotpink> and today's main character is continue_at_nobarrier(9). yes that's the whole manual name, we're being formal today πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

continue_at_nobarrier β€” jump to another function without a barrier πŸ¦‹

no cap, that's literally the entire job description.


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

continue_at_nobarrier (_cl , _fn , _wq );

look at those three lil arguments just vibing there. πŸ’…


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • _cl β€” honestly? undescribed. the docs left this one on read 😭
  • _fn β€” also undescribed. iconic mystery behaviour, ngl.
  • _wq β€” undescribed too. all three of them are giving "we'll figure it out in the source code" energy πŸ’€
yeah bestie, all three arguments literally say -- undescribed -- in the original. i'm not making stuff up, i'm just delivering the truth with better lighting. 🫢

🌈 DESCRIPTION 🌈

so here's the vibe: this function causes fn to be executed out of cl, in wq context β€” or called directly if wq is NULL. 🧚

and this next bit? read it twice, bestie, it's important. πŸ’œ

the ref that the caller of continue_at_nobarrier had on cl is now owned by fn. which means it is not safe to touch anything protected by cl after a continue_at_nobarrier. like, at all. do not pass go, do not poke the closure. it's not yours anymore, the ref has left the building 🫑✨

⚠️ fr fr: after continue_at_nobarrier, everything guarded by cl is off-limits to you. the ownership handed off, and poking it anyway is exactly the kind of chaos that ruins everyone's day. 😭

⭐ SEE ALSO ⭐

go read them all, they're the friend group and this page is just one member of it πŸŒΈπŸ’–


and that's the whole page, bestie!! sourced straight from ./include/linux and dated October 2026 β€” the kernel API manual really said "it's giving future" and honestly? slay. πŸ‘‘βœ¨ πŸ’…

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from