COND_INIT(9)

πŸ“¦ in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… cond_init(9) β€” the wait condition API, explained by your local Unix bestie ✨

okay so bestie, we're in cond_init(9) territory today β€” kernel developer's manual, wait-condition edition. this is the whole "make a thread nap until something's done" situation and honestly? it's giving synchronization slay πŸŽ€


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

#include <sys/systm.h>

void
cond_init(struct cond *c);

void
cond_wait(struct cond *c, const char *wmesg);

void
cond_signal(struct cond *c);

void
cond_signal_handler(void *c);

COND_INITIALIZER();

🌸 DESCRIPTION 🌸

so the wait condition API is literally the "go to sleep, queen, I'll wake you when it's done" of the kernel πŸ‘‘ it lets a thread sleep while it waits for a notification β€” aka a signal β€” that pending work has completed. no cap.

  • cond_init() β€” initialises the wait condition c for use. that's it, that's the vibe check βœ…
  • cond_wait() β€” this is the actual napping function πŸ’€ it sleeps on the wait condition c until whatever the thread is waiting on calls cond_signal() or cond_signal_handler(). and wmesg? it's a pointer to a character string that says why the thread is sleeping β€” like a little "do not disturb: tqbar" note on the door πŸ™ˆ
  • cond_signal() and cond_signal_handler() β€” these two are the "wake up bestie, the work is finished, you may proceed" notification πŸ’– and listen, they operate identically, the only difference is the type of argument they take. cond_signal_handler() takes a void * argument, which is lowkey iconic because it means you can use it directly with APIs such as task_set(9) and timeout_set(9) 🫢
  • COND_INITIALIZER() β€” initialises a declaration of a cond for use 🌈

πŸ¦‹ CONTEXT πŸ¦‹

where can you call these? good question, bestie:

  • cond_init(), cond_signal(), and cond_signal_handler() can be called during autoconf, from process context, or from interrupt context πŸ”₯ flexible queens.
  • cond_wait() can be called from process context. that's the one.

πŸ“ EXAMPLES πŸ“

not me about to show you real production code 😭 taskq_barrier(9) is implemented using the wait condition API, and here's a commented copy of the implementation β€” fr fr, this is the actual source:

static void     taskq_barrier_task(void *);

void
taskq_barrier(struct taskq *tq)
{
        struct cond c;
        struct task t;

        /*
         * any currently running work has to have finished
         * before this new task can be run.
         */

        cond_init(&c);
        task_init(&t, taskq_barrier_task, &c);

        task_add(tq, &t);

        /* wait until the task runs and signals completion */
        cond_wait(&c, "tqbar");
}

static void
taskq_barrier_task(void *p)
{
        struct cond *c = p;

        /*
         * all previous tasks have run, signal the thread waiting
         * in taskq_barrier
         */

        cond_signal(c);
}

see how it all comes together? cond_init(&c) sets it up, cond_wait(&c, "tqbar") has the thread chilling until the task signals, and then cond_signal(c) in the task function is the "you're up, babe" πŸ’… main character energy from start to finish.


okay that's the whole page, bestie πŸ’œ this lil breakdown came to you from the Debian source, dated July 28, 2025 β€” go forth and synchronize your threads, you absolute icon 🧚✨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from
  • nixpkgs unstable: cvs-export
  • πŸ’– girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms