clone_time_ns(9)
π clone_time_ns(9) β a page from the Kernel API Manual, bestie
okay so picture this: it's giving kernel internals, it's giving time namespaces, and honestly? it's kind of iconic. this is clone_time_ns, and yes we're gonna get into it together π«Ά
β¨ NAME β¨
clone_time_ns β clone a time namespace. that's it, that's the vibe. one job, does it slay π
πΈ SYNOPSIS πΈ
struct time_namespace * clone_time_ns (struct user_namespace *user_ns ,
struct time_namespace *old_ns );
look at her. two arguments, one pointer returned, main character energy fr fr β¨
π ARGUMENTS π
user_nsβ the user namespace that owns the new namespace. like, this is who's gonna be responsible for it. the parent, the guardian, the one signing the permission slip π«Άold_nsβ the namespace we're cloning. the blueprint. the original. the one we're copying π
π¦ DESCRIPTION π¦
so what actually happens? you take old_ns, you clone it, and you set the clone's refcount to 1. that's the whole thing, no cap. one fresh namespace, refcount starting at one, ready to live its life π
ngl it's a short description because the function is short. lowkey efficient. we respect that π
β RETURN β
you get the new namespace back π β or ERR_PTR. yes, ERR_PTR, the classic "something went wrong but we're encoding it in a pointer" situation. if it's ERR_PTR, check it properly, bestie, don't just start dereferencing, I'm begging π
π₯ SEE ALSO π₯
- the kernel file
./kernel/time/namespace.cβ where the magic lives, go read it iykyk π copy_time_ns(9)β her sibling, also iconic, also worth a read π§
reminder bestie: every flag, path, and signature above is exactly what the original said β I would never mess with the facts, only the vibe check π
and that's the page! brought to you by ./kernel/time, dated October 2026, and yeah β she's still called clone_time_ns(9). mwah πππΈ
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms