cifs_genl_init(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

🌸 cifs_genl_init(9) β€” a Kernel API Manual moment 🌸

ok so we're in the kernel API manual, section 9, and today's main character is cifs_genl_init. buckle up bestie, this one's short but it matters πŸ’…


✨ NAME ✨

cifs_genl_init β€” literally just registering a generic netlink family. that's the whole vibe. no cap. πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

int cifs_genl_init (void );

like, that's it. that's the function. she's small but she's iconic ✨


πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • void β€” no arguments. nothing. zero. the void is voiding. she takes nothing and she's at peace with that 🫢

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

ok so the whole deal: this thing returns zero if it initialized successfully, otherwise it returns non-zero. that's the entire contract, fr fr.

so like β€” 0 = we slayed, we're initialized, we're so back. anything not-0 = it did not go well, and you should probably pay attention 😭 that's the whole return-value story, no extra lore, don't @ me.

ngl the "non-zero" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here β€” it's just "not success," the docs aren't telling you which non-zero, so don't go inventing meanings. check the source if you need the deets πŸ‘‘

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

  • the kernel file ./fs/smb/client/netlink.c β€” go read it, it's giving source of truth πŸ’œ
  • cifs_genl_exit(9) β€” the counterpart, the cleanup era, the "we're so done here" energy 🧚

and that's the page!! mwah πŸ’‹ this lil guy lives in ./fs/smb/client, dated October 2026, and yes the header/footer said cifs_genl_init(9) three whole times because the kernel really said "consistency is key" ⭐ bye bestie, go init some netlink families πŸ¦‹πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from