cap_inode_need_killpriv(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… cap_inode_need_killpriv(9) πŸ’…

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual page for cap_inode_need_killpriv β€” yes, the manual name is folded in right here, we’re being efficient πŸ’–. This is basically the vibe check for whether an inode change is gonna mess with privilege markings.


🌸 NAME 🌸

cap_inode_need_killpriv - Determine if inode change affects privileges

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int cap_inode_need_killpriv (struct dentry *dentry );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • dentry β€” The inode/dentry in being changed with change marked ATTR_KILL_PRIV.

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

So the question this function is asking is: when an inode has a change applied that’s marked ATTR_KILL_PRIV, does that change affect the security markings on that inode? And if it does, should inode_killpriv be invoked, or should the change be rejected? That’s the whole plot 🫢.

πŸ”₯ RETURN πŸ”₯

  • 1 if security.capability has a value, meaning inode_killpriv is required.
  • 0 otherwise, meaning inode_killpriv is not required.

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

Kernel file ./security/commoncap.c plus this iconic squad:


πŸŽ€ that’s the page, bestie β€” brought to you by source/version ./security, dated October 2026, and titled cap_inode_need_killpriv(9). mwah πŸ’‹
πŸ“¦ where this page comes from