call_rcu_tasks_trace(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ call_rcu_tasks_trace ✨

Okay bestie, so this one is from the Kernel API Manual β€” call_rcu_tasks_trace(9) β€” and it's honestly giving "queue up your callback and let the kernel handle the timing" πŸ’…


πŸŽ€ NAME πŸŽ€

call_rcu_tasks_trace β€” Queue a callback trace task-based grace period


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

void call_rcu_tasks_trace (struct rcu_head *rhp , rcu_callback_t func );

🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • rhp β€” the structure to be used for queueing the RCU updates. That's your little parking spot for the request πŸ…ΏοΈβœ¨
  • func β€” the actual callback function to be invoked after the grace period. The main character, fr fr πŸ‘‘

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

So here's the tea β˜• β€” your callback function gets invoked some time after a trace rcu-tasks grace period elapses. Translation: after all the currently executing trace rcu-tasks read-side critical sections have completed. No cap, that's the whole vibe check βœ…

Those read-side critical sections are delimited by calls to rcu_read_lock_trace and rcu_read_unlock_trace β€” like, that's how they know where one starts and where one ends πŸŽ€

Ok so for the ✨detailed✨ deets on memory ordering guarantees, go peek at the description of call_rcu. It's got the receipts πŸ”₯

🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚

Kernel file ./include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h


And that's the whole page, bestie 🫢 β€” brought to you straight out of ./include/linux, Kernel API Manual edition, dated October 2026. Slay, go queue those callbacks πŸ’…πŸŒˆβ­

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from