btree_merge(9)
β¨ btree_merge(9) β¨
okay so bestie, this is btree_merge(9) straight from the Kernel API Manual, and it's literally about merging two btrees. group-chat huddle time π
πΈ NAME πΈ
btree_merge β merge two btrees, periodt.
π¦ SYNOPSIS π¦
int btree_merge (struct btree_head *target , struct btree_head *victim ,
struct btree_geo *geo , gfp_t gfp );
π ARGUMENTS π
targetβ the tree that gets all the entries. she's eating good tonight πvictimβ the tree that gets merged intotarget. pour one out for her π«Άgeoβ the btree geometry.gfpβ allocation flags.
πΈ DESCRIPTION πΈ
So here's the vibe check: the two trees target and victim may not contain the same keys. no cap, that's a bug β it triggers a BUG. not cute, not slay, just a bug π
This function returns zero if the trees were merged successfully. it may return a failure when memory allocation fails, in which case both trees might have been partially merged, i.e. some entries have been moved from victim to target. so yeah, allocation fail is giving "we tried, bestie, but it's complicated" π
π₯ SEE ALSO π₯
- Kernel file
./include/linux/btree.h B+Tree basics(9)struct btree_head(9)btree_alloc(9)btree_free(9)btree_init_mempool(9)btree_init(9)btree_destroy(9)btree_lookup(9)btree_insert(9)btree_update(9)btree_remove(9)btree_last(9)btree_get_prev(9)
β signing off from ./include/linux in October 2026, btree_merge(9) besties forever π
β¨
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms