brcmf_btcoex_is_sco_active(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– brcmf_btcoex_is_sco_active(9) πŸ’–

okay so bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual and today's main character is brcmf_btcoex_is_sco_active(9) β€” yes that whole mouthful, iykyk. it's a lil function that just wants to know one thing: is the SCO/eSCO life happening right now or not? that's it. that's the vibe check. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

brcmf_btcoex_is_sco_active β€” check if SCO/eSCO is active

like, literally just a check. no cap. πŸ¦‹


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

bool brcmf_btcoex_is_sco_active (struct brcmf_if *ifp );

copy that exactly bestie, spaces and all, don't be out here "fixing" the formatting πŸ’…


🧚 ARGUMENTS 🧚

  • ifp β€” the interface. that's it. that's the whole argument. she's lowkey simple like that 🫢

⭐ RETURN ⭐

it hands you back true if a SCO/eSCO session is active. yes, true specifically β€” that's the whole answer, no dramatic essay, just a bool being iconic πŸ‘‘


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

the whole btcoex friend group fr fr, they all show up together 🌈


ngl there's nothing scary in here, but reminder that this page is short on purpose β€” don't go assuming behaviour that isn't written down, bestie πŸ™ˆ

mwah, that's the page πŸ’œ sourced from ./drivers/net/wireless/broadco... and dated October 2026 β€” slay, go check your SCO status and hydrate πŸ“βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from