bpf_copy_from_user_task_str(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… bpf_copy_from_user_task_str β€” Kernel API Manual, bestie edition πŸŽ€

okay so this is the bpf_copy_from_user_task_str(9) page, and honestly? it's giving "small function, big responsibility" energy. stick with me and you'll get it ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

bpf_copy_from_user_task_str β€” literally just copy a string out of a task's address space, no cap 🫢


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

__bpf_kfunc int bpf_copy_from_user_task_str (void *dst , u32 dst__sz ,
       const void __user *unsafe_ptr__ign , struct task_struct *tsk , u64 flags
       );

look at her, five whole parameters, standing there being iconic πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • dst β€” the destination address, and it lives in kernel space babe. this buffer has to be at least dst__sz bytes long, so no funny business with tiny buffers, ok? πŸ™ˆ
  • dst__sz β€” the max number of bytes to copy, and yes that count includes the trailing NUL. inclusive queen πŸŽ€
  • unsafe_ptr__ign β€” the source address, sitting all the way over in the task's address space. the name has unsafe in it so you already know 🫢
  • tsk β€” the task whose address space is getting borrowed for this little operation πŸ‘‘
  • flags β€” and the only supported flag is BPF_F_PAD_ZEROS. that's it. that's the whole menu, periodt πŸ’€

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

so what she actually does: copies a NUL-terminated string from a task's address space into the dst__sz buffer. super straightforward, main character behavior 🌟

if the user string is too long, she still makes sure there's a zero terminator inside the dst__sz buffer β€” the one exception is when the buffer size is 0. zero-size buffer, zero promises, that's the deal 😭

and if the BPF_F_PAD_ZEROS flag is set? two very specific moods:

  • on success: memset the tail of dst__sz to 0 πŸ’–
  • on failure: memset all of dst__sz to 0 πŸ’€

she's thorough like that 🧚


🌈 RETURN 🌈

  • success β†’ the number of copied bytes, and yes it includes the NUL terminator ⭐
  • failure β†’ a negative error code 😭

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

she runs with a whole squad β€” ngl this list is long and every single one of them made it:

Kernel file ./kernel/bpf/helpers.c, plus:

bpf_obj_new(9), bpf_percpu_obj_new(9), bpf_obj_drop(9), bpf_percpu_obj_drop(9), bpf_refcount_acquire(9), bpf_list_push_front(9), bpf_list_push_back(9), bpf_rbtree_add(9), bpf_task_acquire(9), bpf_task_release(9), bpf_cgroup_acquire(9), bpf_cgroup_release(9), bpf_cgroup_ancestor(9), bpf_cgroup_from_id(9), bpf_task_under_cgroup(9), bpf_task_get_cgroup1(9), bpf_task_from_pid(9), bpf_task_from_vpid(9), bpf_dynptr_slice(9), bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr(9), bpf_dynptr_copy(9), bpf_dynptr_memset(9), bpf_iter_bits_new(9), bpf_iter_bits_next(9), bpf_iter_bits_destroy(9), bpf_copy_from_user_str(9), bpf_strcmp(9), bpf_strcasecmp(9), bpf_strnchr(9), bpf_strchr(9), bpf_strchrnul(9), bpf_strrchr(9), bpf_strnlen(9), bpf_strlen(9), bpf_strspn(9), bpf_strcspn(9), bpf_strstr(9), bpf_strcasestr(9), bpf_strnstr(9), bpf_strncasestr(9), bpf_lookup_user_key(9), bpf_lookup_system_key(9), bpf_key_put(9), bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(9), bpf_task_work_schedule_signal(9), bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(9), bpf_timer_cancel_async(9)


ok that's the whole page bestie, go forth and copy those strings responsibly πŸ’œ

mwah πŸ’‹ β€” this one came from ./kernel/bpf, dated October 2026, and she's filed under bpf_copy_from_user_task_str(9) in case you need to find her again πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from