binder_ctl_ioctl(9)
π binder_ctl_ioctl β like, the whole kernel API manual moment β¨
okay so bestie, welcome to binder_ctl_ioctl(9) β yes that's the manual page name AND the section number, we love a consistent queen π this one lives in the Kernel API Manual and it's all about handling binder device node allocation requests. lowkey iconic.
πΈ NAME πΈ
binder_ctl_ioctl β handles binder device node allocation requests β¨ that's literally the whole job description and she ate π
π¦ SYNOPSIS π¦
long binder_ctl_ioctl (struct file *file , unsigned int cmd , unsigned long arg );
that's the signature, bestie β copy it exactly, no cap, don't you dare retype it from memory π
π ARGUMENTS π
fileβ the file pointer for the binder-control device node. yes, that device node π«Άcmdβ the ioctl command. the vibe check of what you're asking for π«argβ the ioctl argument. the lil payload that comes along for the ride π
π DESCRIPTION π
so this is the request handler for the binder-control device, fr fr. every single request operates on the binderfs mount that the binder-control device resides in β like, that's the whole universe she's working with β¨
and here's the one request on the menu:
BINDER_CTL_ADDβ allocate a new binder device π boom. new device. main character energy π
π₯ RETURN π₯
0on success β slay π- negative
errnoon failure β not slay, but that's the contract π
β SEE ALSO β
- Kernel file
./drivers/android/binderfs.cβ go read the source, iykyk π binderfs_binder_device_create(9)β her cousin π«binderfs_binder_ctl_create(9)β her other cousin πΈ
ngl bestie, this page is short but she's mighty β everything above is the whole lore, don't go inventing extra behaviour, that's not the vibe π
and that's the page!! π source: ./drivers/android, dated October 2026, filed under binder_ctl_ioctl(9) β mwah, go forth and allocate responsibly π«Άπβ¨
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms