auxiliary_device_init(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… auxiliary_device_init(9)

okay so bestie, this one lives in the Kernel API Manual and honestly it's giving "step two of three, don't skip it" energy. Let me put you on 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

auxiliary_device_init β€” the vibe check and the initialization for your auxiliary_device, all in one 🌸


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int auxiliary_device_init (struct auxiliary_device *auxdev );

✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • auxdev β€” the auxiliary_device struct, aka the main character of this whole operation πŸ‘‘

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

So here's the tea β˜•: this function is the second step in the three-step process to register an auxiliary_device. Not the first, not the third β€” the second. Middle child energy, but make it essential.

Now, the important part, and I need you to listen πŸ™ˆ β€” when this function returns an error code, that means device_initialize will *not* have been performed. Which means you, the caller, are responsible for freeing any memory you allocated for the auxiliary_device in that error path directly. No hand-holding, no cleanup fairy, that's on you fr fr.

It returns 0 on success. And on success? device_initialize has been performed βœ…. So from that point on, literally any error unwinding needs to include a call to auxiliary_device_uninit. Periodt.

🚨 And in this post-initialize error scenario β€” bestie, heads up β€” a call to the device's .release callback will be triggered, and all memory clean-up is expected to be handled there. That's the deal. Handle it in .release, not wherever you feel like it πŸ’€

✨ SEE ALSO ✨


aaaand that's the whole page, icon ✨ it comes to you from ./drivers/base, dated October 2026 β€” go forth and initialize responsibly, bestie πŸ’–πŸŽ€πŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from