aemif_config_abus(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… aemif_config_abus(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual, bestie

okay so real talk, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and the star of the show is aemif_config_abus(9). yes the name is a mouthful, no you don't have to say it out loud. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

aemif_config_abus β€” configure async bus parameters πŸ¦‹

like, it sets up the async bus timing stuff. that's the whole vibe.


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int aemif_config_abus (struct platform_device *pdev , int csnum );

she takes two things and gives you back an int. iconic behavior honestly.


πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • pdev β€” the platform device you're configuring for. this is the "who" of the operation 🫢
  • csnum β€” the aemif chip select number. this is the "which one" of the operation ⭐

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

okay so here's the tea: this function programs the given timing values (in real clock) into the AEMIF registers, and it does not forget to take the AEMIF clock into account while doing it. math? in my kernel driver? it's more likely than you think πŸ’€βœ¨

now, the no-locking thing. this function does not use any locking while programming the AEMIF. and before you panic β€” nope, that's on purpose. it's expected that there is only one user of a given chip-select. one user, one chip-select, no drama, no mutex. main character energy only πŸ‘‘

⚠️ lowkey important: that no-locking thing is an expectation, not a force field. it only holds up because of the one-user-per-chip-select assumption. don't come crying to her if you break it πŸ™ˆ

Returns 0 on success, else negative errno. slay. πŸ’…


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

the whole friend group fr fr 🧚


and that's the page!! mwah πŸ’œ this little writeup comes to you from ./drivers/memory, dated October 2026 β€” go off, ti-aemif, we stan πŸ“βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from