acpi_graph_ignore_port(9)
Okay bestie, this is the acpi_graph_ignore_port(9) page β Kernel API Manual, section 9, and itβs literally here to answer one question: should this port node be ignored? π
π NAME π
acpi_graph_ignore_port β Tell whether a port node should be ignored. Thatβs it, thatβs the whole assignment. π
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
Hereβs the signature in all its glory β one function, one argument, no cap:
bool acpi_graph_ignore_port (acpi_handle handle );
π¦ ARGUMENTS π¦
handleβ The ACPI handle of the node (which may be a port node). So yes, it could be a port node β keep that in mind, babe. π«Ά
πΈ RETURN πΈ
It returns true if a port node should be ignored and the data to that should come from other sources instead β specifically Windows ACPI definitions and ipu-bridge. This is currently used to ignore bad port nodes related to IPU6 ("IPU?") and camera sensor devices ("LNK?") in certain Dell systems with Intel VSC. So if your port node is giving bad-vibes energy in one of those setups, this is the check doing the work. π
π₯ SEE ALSO π₯
If youβre checking the references, these are the ones to look at:
- Kernel file
./drivers/acpi/mipi-disco-img.c acpi_mipi_check_crs_csi2(9)acpi_mipi_scan_crs_csi2(9)acpi_mipi_init_crs_csi2_swnodes(9)acpi_mipi_crs_csi2_cleanup(9)
Byeee β this page is filed under ./drivers/acpi, dated October 2026, and itβs acpi_graph_ignore_port(9). Slay, stay boolish, mwah. πβ¨
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms