aa_alloc_secid(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸŽ€ aa_alloc_secid(9) πŸŽ€

okay so we're in the Kernel API Manual bestie, section 9 of the kernel API docs, and today's main character is aa_alloc_secid β€” the little function that hands your AppArmor profile its very own secid. it's giving "allocator but make it fashion" πŸ’…


✨ NAME ✨

aa_alloc_secid β€” allocate a new secid for a profile πŸ¦‹

like, that's literally her whole job. she gets a profile a secid. no cap.


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int aa_alloc_secid (struct aa_label *label , gfp_t gfp );

yes the spacing is exactly like that, don't come for me, that's how it's written 😭


πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • label β€” the label you want to allocate a secid for 🫢 this is the profile's label, she's the one getting the glow-up
  • gfp β€” memory allocation flags ✨ yk, the usual gfp_t vibes, telling the kernel how it's allowed to go get that memory

πŸ‘‘ RETURN πŸ‘‘

so here's the tea, two outcomes:

  • returns 0 and label->secid is initialized πŸ’š slay, we love a success story
  • returns <0 on error, and label->secid gets set to AA_SECID_INVALID πŸ’€ so like, don't just assume it worked, check the return value bestie, fr fr
ngl if you ignore the negative return you're gonna have a bad time β€” the secid will literally be AA_SECID_INVALID, that's your red flag 🚩

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

  • Kernel file ./security/apparmor/secid.c 🧚
  • aa_free_secid(9) β€” the cleanup queen, the counterpart, the "ok we're done here" 🌈

and that's the whole page bestie, go forth and allocate responsibly πŸ’œ

source: ./security/apparmor Β· version/date: October 2026 Β· aa_alloc_secid(9) β€” mwah, love u, bye πŸ“πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from