_dma_no_cache_snooping(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ NAME ✨

okay so this is _dma_no_cache_snooping(9), straight outta the Kernel API Manual πŸ’…

_dma_no_cache_snooping β€” and bestie, the original one-liner after the dash is literally blank, so I’m not gonna invent a summary for you 🫢


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

bool _dma_no_cache_snooping (struct ishtp_device *dev );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • dev β€” the ishtp device pointer, periodt.

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

So the vibe check here is: this function checks, on the current platform, whether DMA supports cache snooping or not. That’s the whole assignment, no cap.

This callback is used to notify the uplayer driver whether a manual cache flush is needed when doing DMA operation. Like, β€œhey bestie, do you need to flush this yourself or not?” energy πŸ”₯

pay attention to this callback implementation, fr fr β€” if you declare that cache snooping is available on a platform that does not support cache snooping, the uplayer driver will receive mismatched data 😭. And if you declare no cache snooping on a platform that does support cache snooping, the cache gets flushed twice and you take a performance hit πŸ’€.

⭐ RETURN ⭐

  • false β€” has cache snooping capability ✨
  • true β€” no cache snooping, need manually cache flush 🧚
yes bestie, the booleans are built like that πŸ™ˆ β€” keep the meanings exactly as written.

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file ./drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c:


made with πŸ’– from the kernel API manual corner β€” source/version vibes: ./drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc, dated October 2026. stay snoopy, bestie πŸ’…πŸ‘‘

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from