__tipc_node_link_up(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

Okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual page for __tipc_node_link_up(9) πŸ’–βœ¨ It’s giving β€œhandle addition of link,” and it’s short, iconic, and very much a kernel-internals moment. 🫢

🌸 NAME 🌸

__tipc_node_link_up β€” handle addition of link πŸ’…

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void __tipc_node_link_up (struct tipc_node *n , int bearer_id , struct sk_buff_head *xmitq );

No cap, that’s the whole signature. πŸŽ€

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • n β€” target tipc_node 🎯
  • bearer_id β€” id of the bearer πŸͺͺ
  • xmitq β€” queue for messages to be xmited on. (Yes, β€œxmited” is the source spelling, bestie; I’m not fixing it.) πŸ“¬
🚨 Node lock must be held by caller, fr fr. Do not skip this.

The link becomes active (alone or shared) or standby, depending on its priority. That’s the whole priority-driven vibe check, and it’s literally the main character energy of this function. πŸ‘‘

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

The whole friend group is here, so don’t leave anyone on read:

Go read them, iykyk πŸ’œ


Mwah πŸ’‹ sign-off time: source/version ./net/tipc, date October 2026, title __tipc_node_link_up(9) β€” that’s the footer tea, and I’m obsessed. Periodt. πŸŽ€πŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from