__parport_register_driver(9)
π __parport_register_driver(9) β like, the kernel API manual bestie β¨
okay so real quick: this page lives in the Kernel API Manual and it's all about __parport_register_driver(9) β the function that gets your parallel port driver on the list. yes the double-underscore is part of the name, don't @ me π
β¨ NAME β¨
__parport_register_driver β register a parallel port device driver π¦
πΈ SYNOPSIS πΈ
int __parport_register_driver (struct parport_driver *drv , struct module *owner , const char *mod_name );
π ARGUMENTS π
drvβ the struct that describes your driver. it's giving main character, it's the whole vibe check of this call πownerβ the owner module ofdrv. literally who owns it π«Άmod_nameβ a module name string. just a lil string, no cap β¨
π₯ DESCRIPTION π₯
so a parallel port device driver calls this when it wants to get notified about ports. not like a cute little ping either β notifications about ports being found in the system, and ports that are no longer available. both directions, bestie. π
if devmodel is true then the new device model is used for registration. that's the whole rule, no drama π
the drv structure is allocated by you, the caller β and it must not be deallocated until after calling parport_unregister_driver. like, do not free it early, that's not the vibe, that's a bug π
π ok now the important part. if you're using the non device model, read this twice:
the driver's attach function may block. the port that attach is given will be valid for the duration of the callback β but if your driver wants to take a copy of that pointer, it must call parport_get_port to do so. good news tho: calling parport_register_device on that port will do this for you automatically. slay, thank you π
the driver's detach function may block too. same deal: the port that detach is given will be valid for the duration of the callback, and if the driver wants to take a copy of the pointer it must call parport_get_port to do so. same rules, different callback π¦
returns 0 on success. β¨ the non device model will always succeeds. but the new device model can fail and will return the error code. so yeah, check your return value, i'm begging π
β SEE ALSO β
- Kernel file
./drivers/parport/share.c parport_unregister_driver(9)parport_get_port(9)parport_put_port(9)parport_register_port(9)parport_announce_port(9)parport_remove_port(9)parport_register_dev_model(9)parport_unregister_device(9)parport_find_number(9)parport_find_base(9)parport_claim(9)parport_claim_or_block(9)parport_release(9)
π§ that's the whole page, you ate it, go register some drivers periodt π
mwah π this one's from ./drivers/parport, dated October 2026, and it's the __parport_register_driver(9) page β ily, bye π
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms