PANTHOR_IRQ_HANDLER(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… PANTHOR_IRQ_HANDLER(9) β€” like, the kernel API manual bestie πŸŽ€

okay so this whole page lives in the Kernel API Manual (section 9, the big-brain kernel docs section, iykyk) and it's all about PANTHOR_IRQ_HANDLER. it's giving "small macro, big responsibilities." let's get into it ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

PANTHOR_IRQ_HANDLER β€” the vibe is: define interrupt handlers and the interrupt registration function. two jobs, one macro, main character energy fr fr πŸ‘‘


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

PANTHOR_IRQ_HANDLER (__name , __handler );

that's it. that's the whole call. so clean, so demure πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • __name β€” ngl bestie, the manpage literally says -- undescribed -- 😭 no description, no lore, nothing. it's a mystery, and we respect it πŸ™ˆ
  • __handler β€” also -- undescribed -- πŸ’€ yeah. same situation. the docs said "figure it out" and honestly? iconic.
lowkey a vibe check moment: neither argument is described in the source page, so don't come for me β€” I'm just reporting what's there 🫢

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

okay so here's the slay: the boiler-plate that lets you deal with shared interrupts gracefully is auto-generated. you don't hand-write it, you don't suffer through it β€” the macro does it for you. periodt πŸ’…

all you actually have to do is call PANTHOR_IRQ_HANDLER just after the actual handler. that's the whole assignment. that's the task. no cap.

and the handler prototype you're working with looks exactly like this:

void (*handler)(struct panthor_device *, u32 status);

like, keep that signature in your notes bestie, it's literally the shape of the thing πŸ“


πŸ’œ SEE ALSO πŸ’œ

go read these next, they're all connected and honestly kind of a friend group 🌈


and that's the page!! πŸ“ it came from ./drivers/gpu/drm/panthor, dated October 2026, and it's filed under PANTHOR_IRQ_HANDLER(9) β€” go forth and register those interrupts, bestie, you're gonna absolutely ate it πŸ’–πŸ§šβ­

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from