INTEL_DISPLA...TATIC_ASSERT(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

🌸 INTEL_DISPLAY_MEMBER_STATIC_ASSERT(9) 🌸

okay so bestie, this is a page from the Kernel API Manual and it's genuinely so niche but so important, like the way it just quietly keeps your structs from going off the rails? we stan. πŸ’…


✨ NAME ✨

INTEL_DISPLAY_MEMBER_STATIC_ASSERT β€” the macro that makes sure your drm members and display members are placed correctly, no cap πŸŽ€


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

INTEL_DISPLAY_MEMBER_STATIC_ASSERT (type , drm_member , display_member );

like, that's the whole vibe. three args, one job, iconic.


✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • type β€” the struct you want to check πŸ” like, which one are we vibe-checking today
  • drm_member β€” the name of the struct drm_device member 🫢
  • display_member β€” the name of the struct intel_display * member ✨

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

okay so use this static assert macro to make sure the struct drm_i915_private and struct xe_device struct drm_device and struct intel_display * members are all sitting at the same relative offsets. that's it, that's the whole assignment. it's giving compiler-enforced friendship bracelet energy β€” everybody has to line up in the same spot or the whole thing falls apart. πŸ’€

bestie this is a static assert, so it's doing its little check at compile time β€” if the members don't line up, you're gonna hear about it. loud. πŸ”₯

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

  • Kernel file ./include/drm/intel/display_member.h πŸ‘‘ β€” go read it, iykyk

and that's the tea, babe β€” this glorious little page came from ./include/drm/intel, dated October 2026, and honestly? she ate. periodt. πŸ¦‹πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from