INTEL_DISPLA...TATIC_ASSERT(9)
πΈ INTEL_DISPLAY_MEMBER_STATIC_ASSERT(9) πΈ
okay so bestie, this is a page from the Kernel API Manual and it's genuinely so niche but so important, like the way it just quietly keeps your structs from going off the rails? we stan. π
β¨ NAME β¨
INTEL_DISPLAY_MEMBER_STATIC_ASSERT β the macro that makes sure your drm members and display members are placed correctly, no cap π
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
INTEL_DISPLAY_MEMBER_STATIC_ASSERT (type , drm_member , display_member );
like, that's the whole vibe. three args, one job, iconic.
β¨ ARGUMENTS β¨
typeβ the struct you want to check π like, which one are we vibe-checking todaydrm_memberβ the name of thestruct drm_devicemember π«Άdisplay_memberβ the name of thestruct intel_display *member β¨
β¨ DESCRIPTION β¨
okay so use this static assert macro to make sure the struct drm_i915_private and struct xe_device struct drm_device and struct intel_display * members are all sitting at the same relative offsets. that's it, that's the whole assignment. it's giving compiler-enforced friendship bracelet energy β everybody has to line up in the same spot or the whole thing falls apart. π
bestie this is a static assert, so it's doing its little check at compile time β if the members don't line up, you're gonna hear about it. loud. π₯
π SEE ALSO π
- Kernel file
./include/drm/intel/display_member.hπ β go read it, iykyk
and that's the tea, babe β this glorious little page came from ./include/drm/intel, dated October 2026, and honestly? she ate. periodt. π¦π
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms