DEVICE_STRING_ATTR_RO(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… DEVICE_STRING_ATTR_RO πŸ’…

okay bestie, welcome to the DEVICE_STRING_ATTR_RO(9)</p> page, straight outta the Kernel API Manual ✨ this one's short and sweet and honestly kind of a vibe.


✨ NAME ✨

DEVICE_STRING_ATTR_RO β€” bestie. it defines a device attribute backed by a r/o string. that's it. that's the whole thing. πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

DEVICE_STRING_ATTR_RO (_name , _mode , _var );

yes the spacing is Like That, we don't judge πŸ’…


🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • _name β€” the attribute name, aka what this thing is called πŸ‘‘
  • _mode β€” the file mode, you know the drill πŸŽ€
  • _var β€” the identifier of the string. it's a string. it's identified. slay πŸ’–

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

okay so picture DEVICE_ULONG_ATTR, right? iconic. love her. this is literally that but _var is a string instead πŸ¦‹

and here's the important part, no cap: because the length of the string allocation is unknown, the attribute must be read-only. like, that's not a suggestion, that's the whole reason the _RO is in the name. the vibe check said nope to writing 😭

bestie please don't try to make it writable. the allocation length is a mystery and we are Not doing that πŸ™ˆ

⭐ SEE ALSO ⭐

the whole fam, in the order the page gives them, because i would never do you dirty like that 🫢


and that's the whole page, bestie, go forth and define your read-only string attributes πŸ’œ

sign-off time: this lil masterpiece lives in ./include/linux, it's dated October 2026, and it answers to the name DEVICE_STRING_ATTR_RO(9) πŸŽ€βœ¨ bye bestie 🫢

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from