ASSERT_LE(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ASSERT_LE(9) πŸ’…

ok so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual, bestie β€” section 9, the kernel dev corner. sit down, grab a strawberry πŸ“, we're learning about a macro that checks one number is less than or equal to another. yes that's it. no cap.


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

ASSERT_LE (expected , seen );

like, that's the whole call. two things go in, vibes come out 🀭


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • expected β€” the expected value, aka the number you think it should be. your main character number πŸ‘‘
  • seen β€” the measured value, aka the number reality actually handed you. the vibe check result 🌸

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

ASSERT_LE(expected, measured): expected <= measured

basically: the expected value has to be less than or equal to the measured one. if it is, slay, we move on ✨ if it isn't β€” the assertion fails, and it's giving "not me getting caught lacking" πŸ˜­πŸ’€

literally <=. that's the whole thing. ASSERT_LE is the "less than or equal" girlie of the ASSERT family. periodt 🫢

ngl, the argument is named seen in the signature but measured in the description β€” that's just how the docs wrote it, i'm not changing a single character of it πŸ’–

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

ok this is the part where the whole friend group shows up, so let me introduce everyone πŸ’…

like, the whole squad. read them all, iykyk πŸ”₯


anyway that's the page, bestie β€” go forth and assert responsibly 🧚

sign-off szn: this gem lives in ./tools/testing/selftests, and the page is dated October 2026. that's the version, that's the date, mwah πŸ’‹πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from